2025 Fintech Regulation Guide for Startups
Aug 29, 2025
·
18 min read
Contents
Regulatory expectations have changed. Fintech regulation in 2025 is more complex, more fragmented, and more actively enforced than it was just a few years ago. Whether you're launching a new platform or scaling an existing model, understanding how financial regulations apply to your business is a foundational requirement.
This guide is built for fintech founders, compliance leads, and legal teams navigating that reality. It covers the regulatory frameworks that apply to fintech startups in the US, UK, and EU.
We’ll break down key licensing triggers, compliance obligations by sector, current enforcement priorities, and common misconceptions that lead startups into trouble. We’ve also included practical guidance on how to build a scalable compliance program, particularly for startups that are moving quickly.

InnReg is a global regulatory compliance and operations consulting team serving financial services companies since 2013. If you need assistance with compliance or fintech regulations, click here.
Does Your Fintech Need to Be Regulated?
Not every fintech startup requires a license. But if you're touching money, moving payments, handling customer data, or offering access to financial products, regulators will likely have something to say.
Here are a few business models that typically trigger fintech regulations:
Brokerage platforms offering stocks, ETFs, or alternative investments
Lending platforms, including BNPL, small business loans, or consumer credit
Wealth management apps, robo-advisors, or model portfolio tools
Crypto exchanges, wallets, and stablecoin platforms
Payment processors and digital wallets
Cross-border remittance or money transfer services
Earned wage access (EWA) or early pay platforms
Banking-as-a-service platforms or fintechs using white-labeled bank infrastructure
Each of these categories is likely to fall under one or more regulatory frameworks, including federal, state, or international frameworks.
Even without directly holding funds, your company may still qualify as a regulated financial entity if you're:
Giving investment advice
Facilitating financial transactions
Marketing financial products on behalf of others
Making credit decisions or using alternative data for underwriting
Holding custody of assets, digital or otherwise
Acting as a service provider to a regulated entity (e.g., sub-adviser, compliance vendor, infrastructure partner)
Fintechs often underestimate how early in the product lifecycle these triggers appear. In some cases, a prototype alone can raise questions from regulators or future bank partners.
You can also use these questions to figure out whether you need to be regulated. If you answer yes to one or more, it’s time to map out which licenses or exemptions may apply and how those shape your compliance roadmap.

What Fintech Regulators Expect in 2025
In 2025, fintech regulation focuses less on what's written in a policy binder and more on how controls work in practice.
Regulators expect operational maturity, not just documentation. Here’s what they’re looking for:
Written and operationalized security programs: Policies must be more than compliance checklists. Regulators expect detailed procedures that map to how your team handles data, risk, and internal controls, such as who does what, when, and how. Roles should be defined, escalation steps documented, and updates tracked.
Proactive monitoring and incident response readiness: It’s no longer enough to respond once something goes wrong. Regulators expect real-time monitoring tools, system alerts, and formal response plans. They’ll look at how quickly you detect problems, how you escalate issues internally, and how often you test your response playbook.
Alignment with evolving regulatory priorities: Agencies update expectations constantly, whether through new rules, enforcement actions, or guidance. Regulators want to see that your compliance program keeps up. That includes tracking relevant changes, assessing internal impact, and making timely adjustments to policies, tools, or vendor relationships.
These expectations apply regardless of your company’s size. Early-stage startups are not exempt. If you’re operating in a regulated space, regulators expect you to act like it.
Core Areas to Understand About US Fintech Regulation
The US fintech regulatory landscape isn’t unified. It’s a complex mix of federal agencies, state regulators, and overlapping rules. Founders and legal teams need to know not just who regulates fintech, but what those regulators care about.
Federal vs. State Oversight
US fintech companies often fall under both federal and state oversight. The split depends on business model, customer base, and licensing structure.
Federal agencies oversee areas like securities (SEC), consumer protection (CFPB), and anti-money laundering (FinCEN).
State agencies handle money transmission, lending licenses, and certain consumer finance laws, each with its own application and reporting requirements.
Operating nationally often means dealing with 50+ state requirements, in addition to federal laws. Some fintechs try to launch in a few “friendly” states first, while others pursue nationwide licensing from day one.

Licensing and Registration
Your licensing path depends on what you offer:
Broker-dealers must register with the SEC and join FINRA. This applies to platforms offering stock trading, fractional shares, or alternative investments.
Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) are regulated by the SEC or state regulators, depending on AUM. If you give investment advice, you likely need this registration.
Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs) are required at the state level if you're moving funds between users or accounts.
Alternative Trading Systems (ATS) must register if you're matching buy/sell orders for securities, even if it's not a traditional exchange.
Getting licensed takes time, capital, and detailed compliance documentation. It’s often one of the longest lead times in a fintech launch.
AML and KYC Obligations
Fintechs that handle money, payments, or crypto typically qualify as “financial institutions” under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). That brings AML and KYC requirements:
Customer identification and verification (CIP)
Suspicious activity monitoring and reporting (SARs)
Sanctions screening (e.g., OFAC lists)
Independent AML audits, policy updates, and training
These fintech regulations apply whether you're a direct provider or using a partner bank or processor. Regulators look closely at how AML is managed and who’s responsible.
Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Rules
While the US lacks a single federal privacy law, fintechs are subject to a patchwork of rules:
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) for financial data safeguards and customer notices
State-level privacy laws, like the CCPA/CPRA in California, grant user rights and impose data handling obligations
Cybersecurity laws, such as the NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500, which require incident response plans, penetration testing, and board-level oversight
Data breaches and weak security controls are a top enforcement focus in 2025. Regulators increasingly treat cyber risk as a compliance failure, not just an IT issue.
See also:
Consumer Protection and UDAAP Compliance
The CFPB and FTC actively enforce laws aimed at preventing Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP). Fintechs must be transparent, accurate, and fair in how they market and describe products, set and disclose fees or rates, collect debts or assess risks, and even handle disputes or customer support.
Even without a formal complaint, your UX, terms of service, and customer journeys are all subject to review. “Dark patterns,” hidden fees, or biased decisioning models can trigger inquiries.

Need help with fintech compliance?
Fill out the form below and our experts will get back to you.
Key US Regulators
Fintech startups often interact with multiple regulators, sometimes directly, sometimes through partners. Understanding who these agencies are, what they prioritize, and how they enforce rules helps you plan better and avoid missteps:
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Oversees securities offerings, investment platforms, and broker-dealers. If your fintech deals with tokenized assets, fractional shares, or anything that resembles a security, the SEC may have jurisdiction. They focus heavily on registration, disclosures, and investor protections.
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA): A self-regulatory organization supervised by the SEC. FINRA governs how broker-dealers operate day to day, including supervision, advertising, and suitability. If you're a registered broker, FINRA exams are part of your compliance lifecycle.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): Regulates consumer-facing financial services. The CFPB focuses on fair lending, disclosure accuracy, UDAAP violations, and emerging products like BNPL and earned wage access. Their enforcement actions often stem from how your product is designed and marketed.
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN): Administers the Bank Secrecy Act. FinCEN enforces AML obligations across a wide range of entities, including money transmitters and crypto companies. You may need to register with FinCEN and submit ongoing reports depending on your activity.
Federal Trade Commission (FTC): Focuses on data privacy, advertising, and fair business practices. The FTC often gets involved when fintechs mishandle customer data or make misleading claims. Even if you're not SEC-registered, the FTC can still bring enforcement actions.
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Federal Reserve, and FDIC: These bank regulators don’t usually oversee fintechs directly. But if you partner with a bank, their standards still matter. Many fintech programs are effectively judged through the lens of what the partner bank is required to enforce.
State Financial Regulators: Every state has its own banking or financial services department. They license lenders, money transmitters, and other non-bank financial firms. State laws often differ on disclosures, fee caps, marketing rules, and reporting obligations.
Fintechs operating nationally often deal with a combination of these entities, depending on their model. The key is to identify who regulates your core activity, who might regulate your partnerships, and where your regulatory exposure could increase as you scale.
Global Fintech Regulation Snapshot: UK and EU
If you're planning to operate in the UK or Europe or even market to users there, you need to understand how fintech regulation works in these regions. The rules are more centralized than in the US, but they’re also evolving fast.
FCA Regulation and the UK Consumer Duty
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is the UK's primary financial services regulator. It oversees everything from electronic money institutions and payment firms to investment platforms and crowdfunding portals.
A few things the FCA expects from fintechs:
Clear, accurate product disclosures
Fair pricing and transparent fees
Adequate safeguarding of client funds
Ongoing reporting and governance
Since 2023, firms have also had to comply with the Consumer Duty, a new set of principles requiring firms to act in the best interest of customers. This includes testing outcomes, not just disclosures. For startups, this shifts the focus from "what we told users" to "how our product actually affects them."
EU Frameworks: PSD2, MiCA, GDPR, and DORA
Fintech firms operating in the EU or passporting into it must comply with several overlapping frameworks:
PSD2 (Payment Services Directive): Covers payment providers and account information services. Requires licensing, strong customer authentication (SCA), and dispute resolution processes.
MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation): Takes full effect in 2025. Introduces licensing for crypto-asset service providers, disclosure standards for token issuers, and capital requirements for stablecoin operators.
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation): Applies to any fintech processing EU user data. Requires transparency, purpose limitation, user consent, and data minimization.
DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act): Applies from 2025. Requires financial entities to build IT risk management, incident response, and third-party oversight into their operations.
Together, these regulations create a structured but demanding environment. Startups that plan to expand into the EU will need to budget time and resources for multiple licensing and compliance tracks.
Licensing Models and Passporting in Europe
The EU's single market allows for passporting, meaning once a fintech is licensed in one EU country, it can operate in others, subject to notification and ongoing supervision.
For example, an e-money license from Lithuania can support EU-wide fintech operations, while a crypto license under MiCA, once granted, allows cross-border activity across member states. Payment institutions authorized under PSD2 can also offer services throughout the EU with one license.
That makes passporting in the EU attractive, but you still need to choose a regulatory home and meet local supervisory expectations.
Cross-Border Considerations
If your fintech is based outside the UK or EU but serves users in those regions, local regulators may still claim jurisdiction. Promoting financial products to users in the UK or EU without proper authorization can lead to enforcement actions, even if your company isn’t physically located there.
GDPR also applies extraterritorially, meaning data localization and processing rules still hold, even if you handle EU user data from servers based elsewhere. Additionally, some regulators have taken issue with how companies implement geo-blocking, especially when it appears to selectively exclude regions in ways that conflict with EU digital market rules.
Fintech Compliance by Sector
Not all startups face the same fintech regulations and obligations. Your sector and how your product functions will shape your compliance roadmap. Below is a breakdown of how regulation typically applies across major fintech verticals.

Broker-Dealers
Platforms offering access to stocks, ETFs, or other securities usually require broker-dealer registration with the SEC and membership with FINRA. This includes fractional investing apps and embedded trading features. Compliance obligations include trade reporting, customer disclosures, supervision protocols, and adherence to suitability rules.
Registered Investment Advisors (RIA)
If your product involves giving investment advice, even through automation, you may fall under the Investment Advisers Act. RIAs must register with the SEC or applicable state regulators and maintain policies for conflict of interest, disclosures, client communications, and portfolio management practices.
Alternative Trading Systems (ATS)
ATS platforms match buyers and sellers outside traditional exchanges. These systems must register with the SEC and operate under a specific regulatory regime, including market surveillance, technology controls, and reporting obligations. Fintechs offering tokenized securities or secondary markets often fall into this category.
Money Services Businesses (MSBs)
Any fintech moving money domestically or cross-border may qualify as a money services business. This requires registration with FinCEN and, typically, money transmitter licenses in each state where customers are located. Licensing requirements vary widely by state and can be time- and cost-intensive.
Lenders
Fintechs offering consumer or small business loans often need lender licenses at the state level. If partnering with a bank to originate loans, you still need to address “true lender” concerns, usury laws, and fair lending rules. Underwriting models must also comply with equal credit opportunity requirements.
Payment Services
Payment apps, processors, and digital wallets often trigger money transmitter rules, PCI DSS requirements, and state-by-state licensing. Some companies operate under a partner model, but compliance obligations still exist around transaction monitoring, data protection, and consumer disclosures.
Crowdfunding Portals
Platforms facilitating securities-based crowdfunding under Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) must register with FINRA and follow disclosure, investor limit, and conflict-of-interest rules. Regulation A+ platforms face even stricter obligations tied to offering statements, testing-the-waters materials, and investor protections.
Digital Banking
Neobanks that operate through a sponsor bank must still follow federal and state regulations governing deposit products, advertising, overdraft practices, and complaint handling. Even without a charter, regulators often hold the fintech accountable for key aspects of the banking relationship.
Crypto and Blockchain
Fintechs operating in crypto must navigate multiple regulatory domains. Depending on the activity, you may need state money transmitter licenses, registration with FinCEN, or even SEC or CFTC oversight. In 2025, MiCA brings new obligations for firms operating in or serving the EU. AML/KYC, custody rules, and consumer risk disclosures are now baseline expectations.
Forex Brokers
Retail forex trading is subject to stringent regulation in the US. Forex broker firms must register with the CFTC and become a member of the National Futures Association (NFA). Regulatory obligations include capital requirements, disclosures, recordkeeping, and surveillance systems designed to detect abuse or manipulation.
Understanding your regulatory category early can shape everything from your product roadmap to your go-to-market strategy. For startups operating across multiple verticals, regulatory layering can add significant complexity and cost. Planning for that up front is critical.
Common Compliance Challenges for Startups
Most early-stage fintechs don’t ignore compliance as much as they underestimate how early and how often it comes into play. Below are some of the most common challenges startups face when building and maintaining regulatory readiness.
Underestimating Licensing Triggers
Many founders assume licensing only applies once they’re live or generating revenue. In reality, your fintech regulation obligations are often triggered at the product design or marketing stage. Even offering demos, building waitlists, or testing pricing models can require a license or at least raise questions from regulators and partners.
Startups frequently misclassify their own product (e.g., calling it “education” when it looks like advice, or “payments” when it qualifies as money transmission). These errors are costly to unwind later.
Managing Compliance While Scaling
Compliance isn't a one-time setup. As you launch new features, expand geographies, or shift business models, your compliance program needs to keep up. That means reviewing policies, updating procedures, retraining staff, and re-evaluating vendors, often on tight timelines.
Without a dedicated team or system, it's easy to fall behind. But being early-stage doesn’t exempt you from regulator expectations or audit requirements.
Multi-Jurisdiction Complexity
Each state, country, or region you operate in may impose different licensing, disclosure, and reporting rules. A product that’s compliant in California might violate marketing rules in New York or licensing requirements in Texas. The same goes for launching across borders; what works in the US often needs significant changes to meet EU or UK standards.
Startups scaling quickly across jurisdictions often hit this wall hard. Without a plan to manage jurisdictional complexity, expansion creates regulatory debt.
Working with Bank and Broker Partners
Many fintechs operate through partners with charters or licenses. That model can work, but it doesn’t eliminate your compliance burden. Regulators increasingly hold banks responsible for fintech programs, and banks pass that oversight down to you.
That means more due diligence, vendor reviews, risk assessments, and documentation, often at the partner’s pace. Without internal compliance ownership, startups struggle to keep these relationships healthy and audit-ready.
Documentation, Monitoring, and Audits
Regulators want evidence. They expect you to document your compliance program, track performance, and demonstrate that controls are working. That includes things like:
Policy approval history
KYC exception logs
AML alerts and resolutions
Cyber incident drills and response timelines
Third-party risk assessments
Startups often scramble to recreate this documentation when a regulator or partner asks. A program that’s functional but undocumented is still a risk. Having clear, current records matters just as much as doing the work.
Misconceptions About Fintech Regulation
Fintech founders are often sharp on product and market strategy, but regulation is a different game. These are some of the most common misconceptions that can lead teams into preventable compliance problems.
You’re Too Small to be on the Radar
Early-stage companies sometimes think regulators only go after large firms. That’s not the case. Enforcement actions often start with a consumer complaint, partner audit, or licensing review. If your product creates risk, even unintentionally, you’re on the radar, regardless of company size.
Startups are expected to comply from day one. Waiting until you scale just makes it harder to retrofit controls later.
Your Bank Partner Covers You
Bank partnerships can help you get to market faster, but they don’t absolve you of regulatory obligations. In fact, banks are now under pressure to tighten oversight of fintech programs, and that scrutiny flows directly to you.
You’ll still be expected to maintain documentation, follow BSA/AML requirements, handle customer issues, and support audits. If you’re not ready, you could lose the partnership or attract regulatory attention.
Crypto Isn’t Regulated
Crypto may have started in regulatory gray zones, but that’s changed. In the US, regulators are actively enforcing existing laws and debating new ones. In the EU, MiCA is bringing formal oversight to crypto firms operating across the bloc.
Whether you're dealing in stablecoins, wallets, or staking products, some set of rules applies. For example, in July, the GENIUS Act changed the landscape for stablecoin regulation in the US. Ignoring compliance signals in crypto today is a risk exposure.
AI Models are Exempt from Oversight
If your product uses AI for credit decisions, fraud scoring, or investment recommendations, you’re still subject to the same laws as traditional providers. Regulators don’t carve out exceptions for algorithms.
In fact, there's increased attention on how automated systems may create bias or lack transparency. Agencies like the CFPB and FTC are signaling that AI-driven models will be held to the same (or higher) standards when it comes to fair lending, UDAAP, and data use.
Emerging Global Standards in Fintech Compliance
Fintech regulation is no longer shaped by just national laws. In 2025, global frameworks are starting to influence how companies build and manage compliance programs, even if they don’t operate directly in those jurisdictions.
See also:
GDPR
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to set the tone for global data privacy standards. It applies to any fintech that processes personal data from EU residents, regardless of where the company is based.
Key requirements include:
Lawful basis for data collection and processing
Clear privacy notices and consent mechanisms
Data subject rights, including access, deletion, and portability
Strict breach notification timelines (72 hours)
GDPR enforcement has been active, with fines targeting both large tech firms and smaller financial companies. US fintechs with EU users need to understand how their systems handle personal data and document that understanding.
DORA
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) came into effect in early 2025. It’s aimed at strengthening IT risk management across the financial sector, including fintechs, cloud providers, and third-party vendors.
Expectations under DORA include:
Business continuity and disaster recovery planning
Incident classification, escalation, and reporting
Cyber testing and third-party risk oversight
Even if you’re not based in the EU, working with EU financial institutions could pull you into DORA’s scope. The regulation reflects a broader shift: regulators now treat tech and compliance as inseparable.
MiCA
The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is Europe’s answer to crypto regulation. It introduces a licensing regime for crypto-asset service providers and sets clear rules for asset-backed tokens, stablecoins, and exchange platforms.
MiCA’s impact includes:
Mandatory whitepapers for token issuers
Capital requirements and reserve management for stablecoins
Licensing and disclosure rules for exchanges, custodians, and wallet providers
MiCA applies across the EU, creating a single regulatory perimeter. For fintechs offering crypto services to EU users, this means clearer rules as well as new obligations and accountability.
Regulatory Trends Fintechs Should Watch
In 2025, regulatory priorities are shifting in ways that directly affect how fintechs operate. Founders and compliance leads need to track these developments early because they shape licensing risk, product design, and partnerships.
Bank-Fintech Partnership Scrutiny
Regulators are tightening their focus on relationships between banks and fintechs. The OCC, FDIC, and Federal Reserve have issued guidance that places more responsibility on banks to supervise fintech partners.
What this means for startups: You’ll face more rigorous onboarding, deeper due diligence, and ongoing monitoring by your partner bank. If your compliance program isn’t well-documented, it could delay launches or trigger partnership terminations.
US and Global Crypto Enforcement
Crypto is still under heavy watch. In the US, the SEC and CFTC continue to test the boundaries of existing laws through enforcement. At the same time, FinCEN is expanding AML expectations for crypto platforms and custodians.
Globally, MiCA and other country-specific rules are reshaping the crypto ecosystem. Startups that previously operated in legal gray areas are now being forced into clear regulatory paths or out of markets entirely.
Open Banking and Data Portability
Open banking is gaining traction outside the EU. In the US, the CFPB’s Section 1033 rule is expected to define data-sharing obligations between financial institutions and third parties.
This will impact how fintechs access, store, and share consumer financial data. Expect new requirements around API standards, data security, and user consent, especially for budgeting, lending, and personal finance apps.
AI and Algorithmic Decision-Making Oversight
AI isn’t unregulated. The CFPB, FTC, and state attorneys general are all watching how fintechs use automated models for credit scoring, fraud detection, and pricing. Fintechs will need to document how their models work, what data they rely on, and how they mitigate bias.
Strengthened Cybersecurity and Resilience Rules
Regulators increasingly treat cybersecurity as a core compliance issue, not just an IT function. The SEC’s 2023 rules on incident disclosure, the NYDFS amendments to its cybersecurity regulation, and DORA in the EU are all signs of a global trend.
Expect more emphasis on board-level oversight, formal response plans, third-party risk, and system testing. For startups, this means building controls and playbooks that regulators and partners can review.
ESG Claims and Sustainability Disclosures
If your fintech makes claims around sustainability, carbon impact, or ESG-related investment products, those claims are now subject to verification. The SEC and international regulators are cracking down on greenwashing.
You’ll need evidence to back up any ESG-related language. Marketing, disclosures, and investment screens all fall under this review. This is especially relevant for neobanks, robo-advisors, and asset tokenization platforms targeting sustainability-conscious users.
—
Fintech regulation in 2025 is a business function that shapes how you build, launch, and scale. The complexity is real, but so are the opportunities for teams that take a structured, forward-looking approach.
Start by identifying your regulatory footprint early. From there, invest in a compliance program that works like an operating system. That means codified processes, clear internal ownership, and tools that scale with growth. It also means staying close to changing rules and market signals.
From licensing strategy to outsourced compliance operations, InnReg helps fintech startups like yours navigate complex regulations while keeping innovation moving forward.
How Can InnReg Help?
InnReg is a global regulatory compliance and operations consulting team serving financial services companies since 2013.
We are especially effective at launching and scaling fintechs with innovative compliance strategies and delivering cost-effective managed services, assisted by proprietary regtech solutions.
If you need help with compliance, reach out to our regulatory experts today:
Published on Aug 29, 2025
Last updated on Aug 29, 2025