FINRA Rule 5121 Explained: Public Offerings of Securities With Conflicts of Interest
Link to FINRA:
Are you navigating the complexities of public offerings involving potential conflicts of interest? FINRA Rule 5121 is designed to address precisely that, providing clear standards for how broker-dealers must handle offerings when their own interests, or those of their affiliates, are directly involved.
This page will guide you on how to manage public offerings with potential conflicts. Whether you’re a compliance professional, legal advisor, or involved in underwriting and capital markets activity at a broker-dealer or fintech platform, this guide lays out the scope, requirements, and implications of Rule 5121.
InnReg is a global regulatory compliance and operations consulting team serving financial services companies since 2013. If you need assistance with compliance or fintech regulations, click here.
What Is FINRA Rule 5121?
FINRA Rule 5121 governs how member firms participate in public offerings when a conflict of interest exists. The rule sets conditions that must be met before a firm can participate in such offerings and imposes disclosure, oversight, and procedural safeguards to protect investors from undue influence or unfair terms.
The rule applies when a firm is issuing its own securities, has control over the issuer, or stands to materially benefit from the offering proceeds. It also applies if the public offering results in a new affiliate relationship or changes the firm’s regulatory status.
Here are the key components of Rule 5121:
Conflicts of Interest and When the Rule Applies
At its core, FINRA Rule 5121 is designed to protect investors from deals that may be influenced by self-interest rather than market fairness.
A conflict of interest exists if:
The broker-dealer is the issuer of the securities
The issuer controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the broker-dealer or its associated persons
At least 5% of the net offering proceeds, excluding underwriting compensation, will benefit the broker-dealer, its affiliates, or associated persons
The offering will result in the broker-dealer becoming an affiliate of the issuer, going public, or causing the issuer to form a broker-dealer subsidiary
These conditions cover both direct and indirect scenarios, including when a firm may gain operational control, financial benefit, or reputational advantage from the outcome of the offering. Once a conflict is identified, Rule 5121 outlines specific conditions that must be met to foster transparency, mitigate risks, and protect investor interests.
Required Disclosures and Conditions for Participation
When a conflict of interest exists, a broker-dealer may only participate in a public offering if certain conditions are met. FINRA Rule 5121 outlines two compliance paths, both focused on transparency and independent review.
The first allows participation if the nature of the conflict is prominently disclosed in the prospectus or offering document, and one of three safeguards is in place. Either the lead underwriter must be unconflicted and unaffiliated with any conflicted party, the securities must have a bona fide public market, or the securities must be investment grade or part of an investment-grade series.
If these conditions cannot be met, the second path requires the involvement of a qualified independent underwriter (QIU). The QIU must participate in the preparation of the offering documents, conduct due diligence consistent with the Securities Act, and be clearly identified in the offering materials along with a description of its responsibilities.
In both cases, the rule requires potential conflicts to be disclosed and addressed through independent oversight or objective market standards.
Use of Escrow Accounts
When a broker-dealer offers its own securities in a public offering, Rule 5121 requires that all proceeds be placed in escrow. The funds must remain untouched until the offering is completed and settled, and the firm demonstrates that it meets the capital requirements under SEC Rule 15c3-1.
Once the offering concludes, the firm must notify FINRA and file a net capital computation as of the settlement date. Unless the firm has secured an exemption from the SEC, the offering must be withdrawn and all proceeds returned to the investors if the firm’s net capital:
ratio exceeds 10:1, or
falls below 120% of the minimum required capital, or
falls below 7% of the aggregate debit items under the alternative standard
The registration statement or offering document must also disclose the expected completion date and the terms for releasing funds from escrow. This requirement is intended to confirm that firms meet financial stability benchmarks before accessing offering proceeds.
Restrictions on Sales to Discretionary Accounts
Rule 5121 places specific limits on how firms with conflicts of interest may sell securities into discretionary accounts. Even if the offering meets other conditions of the rule, a conflicted firm may not execute sales in a discretionary account without first obtaining written approval from the account holder.
This approval must be specific to the transaction and documented in the firm’s records. The rule overrides general discretionary authority that might otherwise permit such transactions without specific written approval. Its purpose is to support informed client decisions when a conflict exists and limit the risk of firms exploiting discretionary authority in situations where their own interests are involved.
Application of Rule 5110
If a public offering falls under Rule 5121 because of a conflict of interest and requires a qualified independent underwriter, it is also subject to the requirements of FINRA Rule 5110. This applies even if the offering would otherwise be exempt from Rule 5110’s filing or review provisions.
The inclusion of Rule 5110 subjects offerings involving conflicts to the same level of regulatory scrutiny as other public offerings. It reinforces the requirement for transparency, fairness in underwriting compensation, and consistency in deal terms across the market.
Exemptions
FINRA may grant exemptions from Rule 5121 in exceptional and unusual circumstances. These exemptions are issued under the Rule 9600 Series and may apply to part or all of the rule, depending on the specific situation.
FINRA considers all relevant factors when reviewing exemption requests, including the nature of the conflict, investor protections in place, and whether the exemption would compromise market integrity. Exemptions are not automatic and are typically reserved for cases where strict application of the rule would be impractical or counterproductive to investor interests.
Insight from the Experts
"Conflicts of interest in public offerings are not always obvious. Rule 5121 forces firms to slow down and evaluate the entire structure of the deal, not just the economics. The requirement to involve a qualified independent underwriter or meet strict disclosure conditions also protects investors and the firms themselves from reputational and regulatory risk."
What Is the Purpose of Rule 5121?
FINRA Rule 5121 is designed to protect investors and maintain market integrity in public offerings where a broker-dealer has a conflict of interest. It outlines precise requirements so that such offerings are conducted with fairness, transparency, and proper oversight. By requiring enhanced disclosures, independent review, and restrictions on conflicted activity, the rule helps prevent self-dealing and promotes trust in the capital-raising process.
Here are the primary objectives of Rule 5121:
1. Promote Transparency in Conflicted Offerings
Rule 5121 requires firms to clearly disclose the nature of any conflict in the offering document. Whether the broker-dealer is the issuer, an affiliate, or stands to benefit materially from the proceeds, the required disclosure gives investors the information they need to assess whether the offering is influenced by internal interests rather than market fairness.
2. Introduce Independent Oversight When Needed
If the conflicted firm cannot meet the conditions that would allow it to proceed independently, the rule requires the participation of a qualified independent underwriter. This requires an experienced, unconflicted third party to conduct due diligence and help validate that the offering terms are reasonable and compliant.
3. Prevent Self-Dealing and Improper Access to Proceeds
To reduce financial risk, the rule requires that offering proceeds be held in escrow until the firm demonstrates it meets key capital thresholds. This prevents undercapitalized or overleveraged firms from using investor funds before meeting regulatory conditions.
4. Protect Discretionary Account Holders
The rule prohibits sales into discretionary accounts without the investor’s written approval when a conflict is present. This provision prevents clients from being unknowingly exposed to conflicted offerings and reinforces the requirement for explicit investor consent.
5. Strengthen Regulatory Consistency and Investor Confidence
By linking to Rule 5110 and applying uniform standards to offerings with conflicts, Rule 5121 reinforces consistent regulatory expectations. This consistency builds investor confidence in the offering process and supports fairness across different firms and market transactions.
Example 1
Underwriting Conflict Due to Affiliate Ownership
A member firm was hired to help manage a public offering for a technology company. The firm’s parent company owned 15% of the tech company’s shares, which created a conflict of interest under Rule 5121. To proceed, the firm brought in an independent underwriter to review the deal and support the offering. The independent firm participated in due diligence and helped prepare the materials shared with investors. Those materials clearly explained the conflict and the independent underwriter’s role. With the right safeguards in place, the offering moved forward smoothly, reinforcing both investor trust and regulatory compliance.
Example 2
Investor Funds Returned After Net Capital Violation
A broker-dealer launched a public offering of its own equity securities to raise expansion capital. Because it was the issuer, Rule 5121 applied. The firm placed the offering proceeds in escrow and disclosed a reasonable completion date and release terms in the prospectus. After settlement, it submitted its net capital computation to FINRA. However, the ratio exceeded regulatory limits, triggering a return of all investor funds. The firm later restructured the offering with stronger financial controls and successfully relaunched it. This case illustrates how the rule protects investors when an offering creates heightened financial risk.
Note: The practical examples are fictional and created solely to enhance understanding of FINRA Rule 1210. They are not based on actual events or individuals and should not be interpreted as real-life scenarios.
FINRA Rule 5121 Violations and Cases
Understanding how FINRA Rule 5121 is applied in real-world enforcement actions offers essential lessons for compliance professionals. These cases illustrate how lapses in disclosure, improper compensation arrangements, or failure to follow procedural requirements can result in significant regulatory penalties.
Below are examples of recent violations that highlight the consequences of non-compliance with Rule 5121.
01
Failure to Fulfill Qualified Independent Underwriter Responsibilities
In 2024, FINRA sanctioned a financial services firm for failing to properly carry out its responsibilities as a qualified independent underwriter (QIU) in connection with multiple public offerings. Although the firm was listed as the QIU, it did not conduct adequate due diligence or meaningfully participate in the preparation of the offering documents, as required under Rule 5121. Instead, it relied almost entirely on materials prepared by the issuer and other parties.
FINRA found that the firm lacked written supervisory procedures addressing Rule 5121 and had no systems in place to verify QIU obligations were being met. The firm was censured and fined $250,000. As part of the resolution, it agreed to implement new internal procedures focused specifically on conflict-related offerings and the responsibilities of a qualified independent underwriter.
02
Improperly Structured Offerings Without Required Conflict Disclosures
In September 2024, a financial services firm was fined $150,000 by FINRA for supervisory failures related to offerings of interest-rate dependent securities. While the primary issue involved inadequate oversight of how offering information was disseminated, FINRA also determined that specific securities were structured in ways that should have triggered Rule 5121 compliance. But the firm failed to follow the required protocols.
Under Rule 5121, firms involved in offerings with a conflict of interest must make clear disclosures and may need to involve a QIU. In this case, the firm’s compliance framework failed to flag offerings with embedded conflicts, bypassing safeguards meant to protect investors from biased deal structures.
Insight from the Experts
"Rule 5121 isn’t just about managing legal risk. It’s about credibility. When firms handle conflicts of interest transparently and bring in independent oversight where required, they demonstrate a commitment to fair dealing. That kind of discipline builds long-term trust with both investors and regulators."
Frequently Asked Questions About FINRA's Public Offerings of Securities With Conflicts of Interest Rule
Understanding how FINRA Rule 5121 is applied in real-world situations can provide valuable insights into compliance and regulatory expectations. Below are examples of violations and cases that illustrate the consequences of non-compliance and the importance of adhering to the rule's requirements.
Need Help With Rule 5121?
InnReg is a global regulatory compliance and operations consulting team serving financial services companies since 2013. We are especially effective at launching and scaling fintechs with innovative compliance strategies and delivering cost-effective managed services, assisted by proprietary regtech solutions.
