FINRA Member Fined for Recording Inaccurate Trading Order Details
May 31, 2024
The Case
The firm failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including WSPs, reasonably designed to supervise the accuracy of order times on its order memoranda. As a result, the firm listed inaccurate order receipts and/or transmission times on 30 percent of the order memoranda for customers’ option orders.
The action also highlights that the firm failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written supervisory procedures (WSPs) designed to oversee the accuracy of order memoranda, including order receipt and transmission times.
Why Does This Matter?
The enforcement action highlights the importance of establishing and maintaining a supervisory system to ensure regulatory compliance.
InnReg's Experience
InnReg has over a decade of experience developing effective supervisory frameworks for fintechs based on a systematic approach to identifying risks, implementing effective controls, and enhancing internal documentation to reduce regulatory burdens. InnReg’s compliance consulting services empower fintechs to enhance policies, processes, and technologies for e-communications compliance.
Learn More About This Topic
For additional details, read how InnReg’s Fintech Compliance checklist can help your fintech build best practices to meet evolving regulatory requirements. InnReg’s framework includes an end-to-end guide for reviewing and testing a supervisory system, conducting business reviews, and testing.
On December 30, 2024, the US Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued final regulations focused on decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms and their role in digital asset transactions.
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced charges against nine investment advisors and three broker-dealers for failures by the firms and their personnel to maintain and preserve electronic communications in violation of recordkeeping provisions of the federal securities laws.
The SEC’s order finds that, from at least October 2018 until January 2022, an investment advisory firm stated in its offering materials and other documents provided to prospective and existing private fund investors that it was voluntarily complying with AML due diligence laws despite those laws not applying to investment advisors.
